[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3417-1] bouncycastle security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3417-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                            Luciano Bello
December 14, 2015                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : bouncycastle
CVE ID         : CVE-2015-7940
Debian Bug     : 802671

Tibor Jager, Jörg Schwenk, and Juraj Somorovsky, from Horst Görtz
Institute for IT Security, published a paper in ESORICS 2015 where they
describe an invalid curve attack in Bouncy Castle Crypto, a Java library
for cryptography. An attacker is able to recover private Elliptic Curve
keys from different applications, for example, TLS servers.

More information:
http://web-in-security.blogspot.ca/2015/09/practical-invalid-curve-attacks.html
Practical Invalid Curve Attacks on TLS-ECDH:
http://euklid.org/pdf/ECC_Invalid_Curve.pdf

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
in version 1.44+dfsg-3.1+deb7u1.

For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.49+dfsg-3+deb8u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.51-2.

We recommend that you upgrade your bouncycastle packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWbrnpAAoJEG7C3vaP/jd0sYEP/0oGLjRD26QDcghTOV4kZpmO
QQc3rXHiyMylQGUVJ6mHFES+dVwHlWy6VumRlQp2uBB/O+afvM3jEo1Mx9jgrYhR
+2hpqc21kh1sIJEi+ZK7MfaGjlg8IVIYXapXi/DdJt0dGGJuji+qN+XWRue5yLgm
08vm4scq8TUohYxpdNnpoWUSJ2/k49aQ60Jz+tz+80UjqDcaxhS7lw1YxqzOHOBs
YABdawwUh0mfguQIIfHS+5R6lb/YzzE07ZVdgQVRzNL4z0PMNCUV4uT6xTWpn/Wx
kvgiDW+Qpw4mkKIAeKkOuHWoXxHsOQfY7DRXfOnyybv0GTDGV0OKuYKbkxXe8kqh
g/msrAfg0EGvHiiFgudlMwvdXpkG+gOqu7YyHbTSSPuD9MFjMJdMQIOeih4+GcPN
Yxvvl6x/JKgagJcNco3G6VzXcbcgHBU8WgdN5xASxJcBhzUBmyTaMRmVtuj8vguP
EhcBa0a/xzpI6TZqnQc3drznU3sqxcvDI3shPKckLN5lJpUXiKaTOcageILkfxpg
NUmZ01YQEI7nYJFjAMflKnqXFcRanTYBHhI7aZxbfueviqx7uTzXLT5oiyf99sIR
DA8+7uVPr6O2QXmnOTleAEIpNYs9VibfAtGt3DRkAAeo3ARRM7+yAxXtmN20uBO9
2fAMEkxz0RpnUdEEtKnw
=P/dD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: