[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3520-1] icedove security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3520-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
March 18, 2016                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : icedove
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-1950 CVE-2016-1954 CVE-2016-1957 CVE-2016-1960 
                 CVE-2016-1961 CVE-2016-1962 CVE-2016-1964 CVE-2016-1966
                 CVE-2016-1974 CVE-2016-1977 CVE-2016-2790 CVE-2016-2791
                 CVE-2016-2792 CVE-2016-2793 CVE-2016-2794 CVE-2016-2795
                 CVE-2016-2796 CVE-2016-2797 CVE-2016-2798 CVE-2016-2799
                 CVE-2016-2800 CVE-2016-2801 CVE-2016-2802

Multiple security issues have been found in Icedove, Debian's version of
the Mozilla Thunderbird mail client: Multiple memory safety errors,
integer overflows, buffer overflows and other implementation errors may
lead to the execution of arbitrary code or denial of service.

For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
in version 38.7.0-1~deb7u1.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 38.7.0-1~deb8u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 38.7.0-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your icedove packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=uSt/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: