[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3646-1] postgresql-9.4 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3646-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 11, 2016                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : postgresql-9.4
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-5423 CVE-2016-5424

Several vulnerabilities have been found in PostgreSQL-9.4, a SQL
database system.

CVE-2016-5423

    Karthikeyan Jambu Rajaraman discovered that nested CASE-WHEN
    expressions are not properly evaluated, potentially leading to a
    crash or allowing to disclose portions of server memory.

CVE-2016-5424

    Nathan Bossart discovered that special characters in database and
    role names are not properly handled, potentially leading to the
    execution of commands with superuser privileges, when a superuser
    executes pg_dumpall or other routine maintenance operations.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 9.4.9-0+deb8u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-9.4 packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=rNEC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: