[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 3655-1] mupdf security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3655-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 26, 2016                       https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : mupdf
CVE ID         : CVE-2016-6265 CVE-2016-6525
Debian Bug     : 832031 833417

Two vulnerabilities were discovered in MuPDF, a lightweight PDF viewer.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the
following problems:

CVE-2016-6265

    Marco Grassi discovered a use-after-free vulnerability in MuPDF. An
    attacker can take advantage of this flaw to cause an application
    crash (denial-of-service), or potentially to execute arbitrary code
    with the privileges of the user running MuPDF, if a specially
    crafted PDF file is processed.

CVE-2016-6525

    Yu Hong and Zheng Jihong discovered a heap overflow vulnerability
    within the pdf_load_mesh_params function, allowing an attacker to
    cause an application crash (denial-of-service), or potentially to
    execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running
    MuPDF, if a specially crafted PDF file is processed.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.5-1+deb8u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your mupdf packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=TD/r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: