[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4006-1] mupdf security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4006-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                                         
October 24, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : mupdf
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-14685 CVE-2017-14686 CVE-2017-14687 CVE-2017-15587
Debian Bug     : 877379 879055

Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in MuPDF, a PDF file viewer, which
may result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.

CVE-2017-14685, CVE-2017-14686, and CVE-2017-14687

     WangLin discovered that a crafted .xps file can crash MuPDF and
     potentially execute arbitrary code in several ways, since the
     application makes unchecked assumptions on the entry format.

CVE-2017-15587

    Terry Chia and Jeremy Heng discovered an integer overflow that can
    cause arbitrary code execution via a crafted .pdf file.

For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.9a+ds1-4+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your mupdf packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/wFe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: