[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4023-1] slurm-llnl security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4023-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 07, 2017                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : slurm-llnl
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15566
Debian Bug     : 880530

Ryan Day discovered that the Simple Linux Utility for Resource
Management (SLURM), a cluster resource management and job scheduling
system, does not properly handle SPANK environment variables, allowing a
user permitted to submit jobs to execute code as root during the Prolog
or Epilog. All systems using a Prolog or Epilog script are vulnerable,
regardless of whether SPANK plugins are in use.

For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 16.05.9-1+deb9u1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
version 17.02.9-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your slurm-llnl packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8VJo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: