[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4089-1] bind9 security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4089-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
January 16, 2018                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : bind9
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-3145

Jayachandran Palanisamy of Cygate AB reported that BIND, a DNS server
implementation, was improperly sequencing cleanup operations, leading in
some cases to a use-after-free error, triggering an assertion failure
and crash in named.

For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
in version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u15.

For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u4.

We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.

For the detailed security status of bind9 please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/bind9

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=84Lf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: