[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4299-1] texlive-bin security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4299-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                        Yves-Alexis Perez
September 21, 2018                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : texlive-bin
CVE            : not yet available

Nick Roessler from the University of Pennsylvania has found a buffer overflow
in texlive-bin, the executables for TexLive, the popular distribution of TeX
document production system.

This buffer overflow can be used for arbitrary code execution by crafting a
special type1 font (.pfb) and provide it to users running pdf(la)tex, dvips or
luatex in a way that the font is loaded.

For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 2016.20160513.41080.dfsg-2+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your texlive-bin packages.

For the detailed security status of texlive-bin please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/texlive-bin

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAluk64kACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtpsAf+MmGxNM/qTfNTuIKqdIN6CIZ5MVao9QT8rR/O3gMJFlohigKMLNNBcAgF
6mHjZ/MicWmDttkSM8Vf664UFayqHlvtCqD5syVm0ddBpJ6qvmx0rId3Ni0m3Y4N
z5JfbcNqhFVu91H9+hs+CMa2r5U9LgRxmOA1K+SfX7rKm4oUZ2BJXNLh4kvt4zEm
u0bzGl00mFhbB7N0EDJqvx3bxtsU269cwwpR6nMFjwBPOtgo1spKhaMIIKoRDeJX
ppIHrZhsiYG+OVKKVFrBkgIcABltVXH+7bmR/+OA0gJ7ebX8VE62LBXEsgoglhbv
idDtwMdhynNUy4NAtdJFHQVPzLphUg==
=vc7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: