[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4312-1] tinc security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4312-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
October 08, 2018                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : tinc
CVE ID         : CVE-2018-16738 CVE-2018-16758

Several vulnerabilities were discovered in tinc, a Virtual Private
Network (VPN) daemon. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project
identifies the following problems:

CVE-2018-16738

    Michael Yonli discovered a flaw in the implementation of the
    authentication protocol that could allow a remote attacker to
    establish an authenticated, one-way connection with another node.

CVE-2018-16758

    Michael Yonli discovered that a man-in-the-middle that has
    intercepted a TCP connection might be able to disable encryption of
    UDP packets sent by a node.

For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.0.31-1+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your tinc packages.

For the detailed security status of tinc please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/tinc

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=o+91
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: