[SECURITY] [DSA 4369-1] xen security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4369-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
January 14, 2019 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : xen
CVE ID : CVE-2018-19961 CVE-2018-19962 CVE-2018-19965
CVE-2018-19966 CVE-2018-19967
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Xen hypervisor:
CVE-2018-19961 / CVE-2018-19962
Paul Durrant discovered that incorrect TLB handling could result in
denial of service, privilege escalation or information leaks.
CVE-2018-19965
Matthew Daley discovered that incorrect handling of the INVPCID
instruction could result in denial of service by PV guests.
CVE-2018-19966
It was discovered that a regression in the fix to address
CVE-2017-15595 could result in denial of service, privilege
escalation or information leaks by a PV guest.
CVE-2018-19967
It was discovered that an error in some Intel CPUs could result in
denial of service by a guest instance.
For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
version 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11.
We recommend that you upgrade your xen packages.
For the detailed security status of xen please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/xen
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JWnH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: