[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4588-1] python-ecdsa security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4588-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
December 17, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : python-ecdsa
CVE ID         : CVE-2019-14853 CVE-2019-14859

It was discovered that python-ecdsa, a cryptographic signature library
for Python, incorrectly handled certain signatures. A remote attacker
could use this issue to cause python-ecdsa to either not warn about
incorrect signatures, or generate exceptions resulting in a
denial-of-service.

For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
in version 0.13-2+deb9u1.

For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
version 0.13-3+deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your python-ecdsa packages.

For the detailed security status of python-ecdsa please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/python-ecdsa

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEAqSkbVtrXP4xJMh3EL6Jg/PVnWQFAl34+5QACgkQEL6Jg/PV
nWThYAf+PH/Het1sH5n/p+JnC9ys9BjbJw/bUrXl0RYx812cWlVo4wWkAyjS9xD/
q0tR8Gx2wqAEauGa8Vy8H2hP8iW82+lCGlOoWNMqpVE+x1fwTLA8GCwH6f/UBrPC
5UJv06X6WYtrp3l3NKnq5IOR4QmWIVg3+gmrlm+6wC5NELwOCg0eH79vy+qtbc0w
7LaEI4IOi7yz11sXo7O0vu31S70EiwzRW6kyjlLfOrPN2OigiKYOkdAbWUocnSkR
Uy/LlLCYZry60wbUu9adOz/MOib2Bc9ARzskPrTPUQ0JgrZT1kiUIFU18mmVW9ym
qD3fYFLisZQT0hcu1C1D+UDfAVrpQQ==
=CvMQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: