[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4791-1] pacemaker security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4791-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
November 13, 2020                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : pacemaker
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-25654
Debian Bug     : 973254

Ken Gaillot discovered a vulnerability in the Pacemaker cluster
resource manager: If ACLs were configured for users in the "haclient"
group, the ACL restrictions could be bypassed via unrestricted IPC
communication, resulting in cluster-wide arbitrary code execution with
root privileges.

If the "enable-acl" cluster option isn't enabled, members of the
"haclient" group can modify Pacemaker's Cluster Information Base without
restriction, which already gives them these capabilities, so there is
no additional exposure in such a setup.

For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.0.1-5+deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your pacemaker packages.

For the detailed security status of pacemaker please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pacemaker

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KMeH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: