[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4801-1] brotli security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4801-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
December 01, 2020                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : brotli
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-8927

A buffer overflow was discovered in Brotli, a generic-purpose lossless
compression suite.

For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.0.7-2+deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your brotli packages.

For the detailed security status of brotli please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/brotli

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mzSF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: