[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5052-1] usbview security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5052-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
January 21, 2022                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : usbview
CVE ID         : CVE-2022-23220

Matthias Gerstner reported that usbview, a USB device viewer, does not
properly handle authorization in the PolicyKit policy configuration,
which could result in root privilege escalation.

For the oldstable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed
in version 2.0-21-g6fe2f4f-2+deb10u1.

For the stable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.0-21-g6fe2f4f-2+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your usbview packages.

For the detailed security status of usbview please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/usbview

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=262s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: