[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 5358-1] asterisk security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5358-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                          Markus Koschany
February 23, 2023                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : asterisk
CVE ID         : CVE-2022-23537 CVE-2022-23547 CVE-2022-31031 CVE-2022-37325
                 CVE-2022-39244 CVE-2022-39269 CVE-2022-42705 CVE-2022-42706

Multiple security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Asterisk, an Open
Source Private Branch Exchange. Buffer overflows and other programming errors
could be exploited for launching a denial of service attack or the execution of
arbitrary code.

For the stable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:16.28.0~dfsg-0+deb11u2.

We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages.

For the detailed security status of asterisk please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/asterisk

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HsMO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: