[SECURITY] [DSA 5419-1] c-ares security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5419-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Aron Xu
June 07, 2023 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : c-ares
CVE ID : CVE-2023-31130 CVE-2023-32067
Debian Bug :
Two vunerabilities were discovered in c-ares, an asynchronous name
resolver library:
CVE-2023-31130
ares_inet_net_pton() is found to be vulnerable to a buffer underflow
for certain ipv6 addresses, in particular "0::00:00:00/2" was found
to cause an issue. c-ares only uses this function internally for
configuration purposes, however external usage for other purposes may
cause more severe issues.
CVE-2023-32067
Target resolver may erroneously interprets a malformed UDP packet
with a lenght of 0 as a graceful shutdown of the connection, which
could cause a denial of service.
For the stable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.17.1-1+deb11u3.
We recommend that you upgrade your c-ares packages.
For the detailed security status of c-ares please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/c-ares
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhhz+aYQl/Bp4OTA7O1LKKgqv2VQFAmSAEaIACgkQO1LKKgqv
2VRDGQf/dYEAeHJPGUsjOZqvhLvgCeKqgBuB0N3fz5Xpm/JmMmCoCihipy5xCCtA
FnUifM+ERPjhkHPgerZEKPW9gSI/RXcbefRYu2sTfvaC0td3Gs1ZyGB4A3RrL6fC
wEeMU3jYnfDZBfJpzmCBDx7HhYPx/IlKLWThEFvqvHZxTiKehelKdjV/VhOh9fvO
qawPbrMt+DFeBabpN9Hbm1mqkDmeKLfeLzwGSXsSEKGpYPoz+6BCizFgppTHGIif
WeBRdbcB0OA/qDD540ZLMRXCq53xmcU7qe8yDsdMuflX5ANIJ4iyG2pDYO3uwxcf
CkDOofiTQdumVCGB6BZYVeucTc0dWg==
=4/KK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: