[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4009-1] shadowsocks-libev security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4009-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
October 29, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : shadowsocks-libev
CVE ID         : CVE-2017-15924

Niklas Abel discovered that insufficient input sanitising in the the
ss-manager component of shadowsocks-libev, a lightweight socks5 proxy,
could result in arbitrary shell command execution.

For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 2.6.3+ds-3+deb9u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your shadowsocks-libev packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Wq6w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: