[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4691-1] pdns-recursor security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4691-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
May 21, 2020                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : pdns-recursor
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-10955 CVE-2020-12244

Two vulnerabiliites have been discovered in PDNS Recursor, a resolving
name server; a traffic amplification attack against third party
authoritative name servers (NXNSAttack) and insufficient validation of
NXDOMAIN responses lacking an SOA.

The version of pdns-recursor in the oldstable distribution (stretch) is
no longer supported. If these security issues affect your setup, you
should upgrade to the stable distribution (buster).

For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
version 4.1.11-1+deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your pdns-recursor packages.

For the detailed security status of pdns-recursor please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/pdns-recursor

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PFun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: