[SECURITY] [DSA 5507-1] jetty9 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5507-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Markus Koschany
September 28, 2023 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : jetty9
CVE ID : CVE-2023-26048 CVE-2023-26049 CVE-2023-36479 CVE-2023-40167
CVE-2023-41900
Multiple security vulnerabilities were found in Jetty, a Java based web server
and servlet engine.
The org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI class has been deprecated. It is potentially
unsafe to use it. The upstream developers of Jetty recommend to use Fast CGI
instead. See also CVE-2023-36479.
CVE-2023-26048
In affected versions servlets with multipart support (e.g. annotated with
`@MultipartConfig`) that call `HttpServletRequest.getParameter()` or
`HttpServletRequest.getParts()` may cause `OutOfMemoryError` when the
client sends a multipart request with a part that has a name but no
filename and very large content. This happens even with the default
settings of `fileSizeThreshold=0` which should stream the whole part
content to disk.
CVE-2023-26049
Nonstandard cookie parsing in Jetty may allow an attacker to smuggle
cookies within other cookies, or otherwise perform unintended behavior by
tampering with the cookie parsing mechanism.
CVE-2023-40167
Prior to this version Jetty accepted the `+` character proceeding the
content-length value in a HTTP/1 header field. This is more permissive than
allowed by the RFC and other servers routinely reject such requests with
400 responses. There is no known exploit scenario, but it is conceivable
that request smuggling could result if jetty is used in combination with a
server that does not close the connection after sending such a 400
response.
CVE-2023-36479
Users of the CgiServlet with a very specific command structure may have the
wrong command executed. If a user sends a request to a
org.eclipse.jetty.servlets.CGI Servlet for a binary with a space in its
name, the servlet will escape the command by wrapping it in quotation
marks. This wrapped command, plus an optional command prefix, will then be
executed through a call to Runtime.exec. If the original binary name
provided by the user contains a quotation mark followed by a space, the
resulting command line will contain multiple tokens instead of one.
CVE-2023-41900
Jetty is vulnerable to weak authentication. If a Jetty
`OpenIdAuthenticator` uses the optional nested `LoginService`, and that
`LoginService` decides to revoke an already authenticated user, then the
current request will still treat the user as authenticated. The
authentication is then cleared from the session and subsequent requests
will not be treated as authenticated. So a request on a previously
authenticated session could be allowed to bypass authentication after it
had been rejected by the `LoginService`. This impacts usages of the
jetty-openid which have configured a nested `LoginService` and where that
`LoginService` is capable of rejecting previously authenticated users.
For the oldstable distribution (bullseye), these problems have been fixed
in version 9.4.39-3+deb11u2.
For the stable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been fixed in
version 9.4.50-4+deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your jetty9 packages.
For the detailed security status of jetty9 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/jetty9
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=j7dG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: