also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez <ana@debian.org> [2014-08-18 15:15 +0200]:
> Our reject message was meant to have the submitter coordinating
> with the team to avoid duplicating topics. We rejected the talk
> for the main schedule but we expected this to be schedule as
> ad-hoc. I don't understand why the submitter waited one month to
> discuss this since the reject messages were sent.
The submitter read the talks team rejection as just that,
a rejection of the idea. He replied to your rejection on the next
day, clarifying his plans, so as to prevent any misunderstanding. He
has not received a reply.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org
DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)