Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: 649718@bugs.debian.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:16:17 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1409281115590.30030@herc.mirbsd.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87d2agpttg.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.11.1409271827180.8220@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <[🔎] 87iok8q5is.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <[🔎] 87d2agpttg.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>

Rob Browning dixit:

>Uploaded -6.  Please let me know if if helps when you have a chance to
>try it.

Thanks. Build of -7 started.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :)  -- Ted Unangst über *fs

Reply to:

References:
- guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
- Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
- Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Next by Date: Re: Log for attempted build of libindi_0.9.8.1-5 on m68k (dist=unstable)
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Next by thread: -7 builds (was Re: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread