Re: dash behaviour, was Re: core dump analysis
Hi Finn,
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 6:08 AM Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> When dash is feeling crashy, you can get results like this:
>
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> Aborted (core dumped)
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> Aborted (core dumped)
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> Aborted (core dumped)
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> Aborted (core dumped)
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~#
>
> But when it's not feeling crashy, you can't:
>
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
> root@debian:~# sh /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh
> Warning: mountdevsubfs should be called with the 'start' argument.
>
> The only way I have found to alter dash's inclination to crash is to
> reboot. (I said previously I was unable to reproduce this in a single user
> mode shell but it turned out to be more subtle.)
That sounds like memory corruption somewhere else, e.g.
in the buffer cache...
Can you reproduce with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: