Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer

To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>, debian-68k@lists.debian.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:31:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r0s73uzi.fsf@igel.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 63d4ef2b-ffdc-0294-30c8-aac50ee7b946@gmail.com> (Michael Schmitz's message of "Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:00:40 +1200")
References: <4a9c1d0d-07aa-792e-921f-237d5a30fc44.ref@yahoo.com> <[🔎] c73f8f04-944c-107c-4343-ade1deb3098c@gmail.com> <[🔎] 878rekz0md.fsf@igel.home> <[🔎] f6ca1bd9-419b-f18e-100a-d212bdbf3da1@gmail.com> <[🔎] 87o7nfyd7e.fsf@igel.home> <[🔎] cb1059f0-527e-2023-9c60-abcbf9eda9b7@gmail.com> <[🔎] 87jzy3y79y.fsf@igel.home> <[🔎] 5824d97d-683b-a354-3c39-cb0f54e50bc0@gmail.com> <[🔎] 06c14a4a-1679-31d6-0501-97e20741f88a@gmail.com> <[🔎] 13d36a79-5aae-d63c-5014-5503688f07bb@linux-m68k.org> <[🔎] d97fb295-886d-226a-c8f9-6359562d919f@gmail.com> <1d9955d2-6016-a238-142a-887f95465dd8@linux-m68k.org> <4763c8e2-6fb3-eda6-10d0-94ed1d01cd60@gmail.com> <a5d70bac-bd00-7131-9ca0-18976f539adf@linux-m68k.org> <b150c146-cade-bcd3-9c34-d99284dcd153@gmail.com> <c3d2d874-e366-1d3b-71b0-7a089d40308a@linux-m68k.org> <[🔎] 1fcaa695-5c2d-0c76-444d-6d6be0105f6e@linux-m68k.org> <[🔎] 87y1mgryp1.fsf@igel.home> <[🔎] ff777f08-a8a5-6f16-e197-6f2ee2510e56@gmail.com> <[🔎] a72de14b-2e3a-60c3-0aba-81e36d2a68ae@linux-m68k.org> <[🔎] 63d4ef2b-ffdc-0294-30c8-aac50ee7b946@gmail.com>

On Apr 26 2023, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> The exception frame is copied to the signal frame for informational
> purposes only

This is not for informational purpose.  It is the interrupted context
that is restored by the kernel in the sigreturn syscall.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

Reply to:

References:
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: reliable reproducer, was Re: core dump analysis
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
- Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
Next by Date: Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
Previous by thread: Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
Next by thread: Re: signal delivery, was Re: reliable reproducer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread