[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lynx and Unicode



Mario Lang, le Fri 02 May 2008 15:03:16 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> > Mario Lang, le Fri 02 May 2008 12:52:57 +0200, a écrit :
> >> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> writes:
> >> > Mario Lang, le Fri 02 May 2008 11:55:30 +0200, a écrit :
> >> >> Samuel: Did you already submit your unicode braille tables to Debian?
> >> >
> >> > They are in the console-data package, yes.
> >> 
> >> Nice, I see the .psf files in there.   But I could not find the
> >> necessary unimap anywhere.  Can you please shed a little light on this?
> >
> > Oops, it looks like it got forgoten in the bug report, and since I had
> > it already installed, I never noticed that.
> 
> OK, I guess you will follow up on this one then?

Already done so, yes.

> > Btw, I was thinking about maybe adding an option to setfont, that would
> > automatically extend the loaded 256-char font with braille patterns.
> > That would avoid having to write lat2brl, lat4brl, lat7brl, etc.
> 
> or lat1brl, which is what I'd like to use.
> This also answers my question regarding duplicity.  Yes, I think
> extending setfont (or whatever is actually non-deprecated these days)
> would make sense, since duplicating all the existing fonts
> seems like very bad and error-prone.

Yep.

Samuel


Reply to: