Re: sphinx* packages

To: debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: sphinx* packages
From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:51:32 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] d7d94c35-efca-3ca6-30f1-50e9285e3994@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20171103084537.akhd4jqifcigpa4c@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>
References: <[🔎] d5b5d325-9dfb-c6bd-1ff9-20b62c099459@debian.org> <[🔎] 20171103084127.bqgtptxsb34wllne@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <[🔎] 20171103084537.akhd4jqifcigpa4c@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr>

Hi,

On 03-11-17 09:45, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I'd say call them 0.8+5prealpha+1 and 1.0.8+5prealpha+1

I'll do that then.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- sphinx* packages
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Re: sphinx* packages
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
- Re: sphinx* packages
  - From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: sphinx* packages
Next by Date: Re: sphinx* packages
Previous by thread: Re: sphinx* packages
Next by thread: Re: sphinx* packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread