Re: 5.7 Release Plan / Timeline?
Hi all,
On 2023-09-17 22:23, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I have to watch out for the workload I accumulate, so thanks
> Christian for the opportunity to settle things for the upcoming
> updates.
I guess coordination: who is available, who is working on what, should
also be part of the list.
I also forgot another important thing: we need to decide which GPU
architectures we want to support, ideally without the hassle of a
package split.
I've created a wiki page [1] to gather the info. This might create a bit
of overhead this round, but the goal I propose is to gather experience
this round, and find a process template so that any future updates are
as simple as possible.
>> On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 18:54 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
>>> * Infrastructure: I was looking forward to seeing how this process
>>> runs through CI infra, to iron out the final bugs. To that end, it
>>> would help me if uploaders interact with the platform: what's not
>>> working for you, what's missing, etc.
>
> Thanks, will keep an eye on it. Any issues, we should just
> point them out on the mailing list?
Hm, good question. I think the most helpful would be to file an issue in
the infra repo [2], this way I can track it better -- thanks! Please
file anything that bugs you, I'll see what I can do about it.
However, please also check your upload's results. Did the test get
executed correctly on all GPU-arches (see log)? Did reverse dependencies
get queued for all GPU-arches? And so on.
I do see failing tests on my end, but e.g. a missing queue entry for an
arch is not immediately obvious to see, nor are test suite issues.
Best,
Christian
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/community/team-project/-/wikis/ROCm-5.7-Release-Plan
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-team-infra/-/issues
Reply to: