Hi folks,
I think I've addressed the issues raised in my previous mail about rocm-compilersupport [1]. The binaries and the questionably licensed code have been filtered from the tarball via d/copyright exclusions. That addresses points (1) and (3). The rename of
very symbol can only have one version
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rocm-compilersupport": * Package name : rocm-compilersupport Version : 6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg-1~exp1 * URL : https://github.com/ROCm/ROCm-CompilerSupport * License : Expat, NCSA * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/rocm-team/rocm-compilersupport Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: libamd-comgr2 - ROCm code object manager libamd-comgr-dev - ROCm code object manager - development package To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/rocm-compilersupport/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rocm-compilersupport/rocm-compilersupport_6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg-1~exp1.dsc Changes since the last upload: rocm-compilersupport (6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 6.0+git20231212.4510c28+dfsg * d/watch: follow release/17.x branch * Update upstream URLs * d/control: update Build-Depends to clang-17 * Add patch to restore original amd_comgr_get_isa_count symbol version. Regards, -- Cordell Bloor
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/2024/01/msg00087.html
[2]: https://www.airs.com/blog/archives/300