Loic Prylli <Loic.Prylli@ens-lyon.fr> writes: > Anyway in allcases, we would have something very similar to the hamm > situation for i386, if you replace: > gcc -> egcs1.0.3a > egcs -> newest egcs > (expect they are more things to ignore in egcs than in the original > gcc package). I think this would be the best solution. Especially since I need a good c++ compiler ;) Falk