[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: strange problem with LX



* Luke Shulenburger (sluke@bartender.mit.edu) wrote:

> Thanks for the suggestions.  I've checked /proc/cpuinfo and it detects my

No problem.

> processor as 533Mhz just as advertised.  I'm running a 2.4.2 kernel,
> but have been for quite some time and these problems are much more
> recent than my kernel updates...  Top reports the usage as system time, 
> and not user time.  I'm playing around with vmstat, but am a bit
> unfamiliar.  The number that seems to be telling is that whenever I run
> vmstat -n 1. It reports tens of thousands of interrupts per second, and
> system time around 95.  I'm at a loss as to what would be causing these
> interrupts.  any suggestions?

Hmm, that does sound odd; a couple of things:
  1) Does vmstat -n 1  seem to be scrolling at about a line a second?  If it is going a lot slower than that then chances are the interrupt count might be false.
	2) cat /proc/interrupts;sleep 10;cat /proc/interrupts

	   should help you see where the interrupts are coming from; you should be
	getting about 1024 a second.

For reference here is the first few lines of a vmstat -n 1 of this Alpha LX:

   procs                      memory    swap          io     system         cpu
r  b  w   swpd   free   buff  cache  si  so    bi    bo   in    cs  us  sy  id
0  0  0    128  18856   6112 129584   0   0    37    17  353    84  43   3  54
0  0  0    128  18856   6112 129584   0   0     0     0 1057   731  11   2  88
1  0  0    128  18856   6112 129584   0   0     0     0 1055   715  12   2  86

What does 'top' show (if anything) as the most active process?

Dave
			 
	
 ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ----------------------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/



Reply to: