Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?

To: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Hemlock <michael@etalon.net>, debian_amd64 <debian-amd64@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
From: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:03:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4493C570.6040906@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zmgchk60.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <[🔎] 20060616175521.M28505@www.etalon.net> <[🔎] 87zmgchk60.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

+ ext3 can do ordered mode (default) ensuring that any data written is
  correct and consistent. With xfs or even reiserfs (*shiver*) you can
  end up with random data in recently written parts of the file on
  crash.

ReiserFS can do ordered mode since Linux 2.6.6 and it's actually thedefault mode too.


Michal

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
  - From: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <jean-luc.coulon@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- XFS, EXT3 or some other?
  - From: "Hemlock" <michael@etalon.net>
- Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: ia32 chroot caveat(s)
Next by Date: Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
Previous by thread: Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
Next by thread: Re: XFS, EXT3 or some other?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread