Re: contemplating conversion of an r-pi3b based system to a rock64
> But unless they are sneaking in under the FCC's radar, which they aren't
> else customs would padlock the container, it does have to be an FCC
> approved frequency and protocol in order to be able to label it with an
Actually, that's a good question since there's a ham band from
2300-2450 which we "share" with other users at the top. In return for
being outnumbered at least 1000:1 we can run more power, but malicious
interference is verboten. It wouldn't be the first time something
like this slid by though, a new service.
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/allocations.html But you
can buy a WiFi card for $5, a ham rig is more like at least $100 and
hams are a dying breed.
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/Band%20Chart/Hambands4-web-color_4-25-17.pdf
On 9/4/17, Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> wrote:
> Try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logitech_Unifying_receiver
> It's sort of like Bluetooth without pairing. Not sure about the FCC
> part but it's 2.4 GHz like Bluetooth or WiFi.
>
> On 9/4/17, Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> wrote:
>> On Monday 04 September 2017 12:07:56 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> > But aren't the huge majority of the wireless keyboards and mice just
>>> > BT at the core? Max reliable range when the dongles can see the
>>> > master is about 20 feet. I put the mouse in the box the pi is in,
>>> > and had BT do a scan with bluetoothctl, while I jiggled the mouse,
>>> > nothing detected.
>>>
>>> Certainly Logitech's wireless is not BT. I seem to recall reading
>>> that they found BT way too unreliable and instead use their own
>>> protocol. Not sure about other makes.
>>
>> But unless they are sneaking in under the FCC's radar, which they aren't
>> else customs would padlock the container, it does have to be an FCC
>> approved frequency and protocol in order to be able to label it with an
>> FCC iD # of JNZYR0017 on the bottom of this K360. It also has regulatory
>> labels from at least a dozen other national regulatory agencies from all
>> over the planet. A very busy label. So the frequency and protocol are
>> supposedly known to the various regulatory agencies. The above Jnumber
>> doesn't not search in their database, at least not those pieces I can
>> access.
>>
>> Cheers, Gene Heskett
>> --
>> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
>> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
>> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -------------
> No, I won't call it "climate change", do you have a "reality problem"? -
> AB1JX
> Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach
>
--
-------------
No, I won't call it "climate change", do you have a "reality problem"? - AB1JX
Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach Impeach
Reply to: