Re: Status of dpkg-shlibdeps tracking ARM object linkage ABI mismatches
Hi,
On 2023-06-28 01:41, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 11:19:21 +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > are written in
> > Pascal. It seems that fpc just emits the wrong flags. As an example,
> > here is the readelf output for the armhf version of cqrlog. Note that
> > Tag_ABI_VFP_args is not set either.
>
> Oh, hmm, could you file a report for this (perhaps preferably
> upstream)? (Or perhaps you did already? :)
Done, see https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/40374
and https://bugs.debian.org/1038868.
> > astap
> > astap-cli
> > c-evo-dh-gtk2
> > c-evo-dh-stdai
> > cqrlog
> > doublecmd-gtk
> > doublecmd-plugins
> > doublecmd-qt
> > el-ixir
> > fp-compiler-3.2.2
> > fp-ide-3.2.2
> > fp-units-castle-game-engine
> > fp-units-rtl-3.2.2
> > fp-utils-3.2.2
> > gearhead
> > gearhead-sdl
> > goverlay
> > lazpaint-gtk2
> > lazpaint-qt5
> > mricron
> > nbc
> > pasdoc
> > tomboy-ng
> […]
> > view3dscene
> > winff-gtk2
> > winff-qt
>
> Hmm I guess these are going to be problematic for dpkg-shlibdeps when
> trying to analyze these objects against the shared libraries they link
> against.
Once fpc is fixed, we could maybe rebuild all of the above?
> > clisp-module-fastcgi_2.49.20210628.gitde01f0f-3_armhf.deb ./usr/lib/clisp-2.49.93+/fastcgi/fastcgi.o 0x5000000: Version5 EABI TAG_ABI_VFP_ARGS
>
> This seems like something to fix.
>
> > What do we want to do about those? I can take care of filing bug reports
> > asking to add the missing flags if we agree it's a good idea.
>
> I guess it would be interesting to know whether this is due to these
> having been built with old toolchains (and never been rebuilt since),
> or there's some toolchain or build machinery issue at play or similar.
Nope, I've rebuilt clisp on armhf and the flags are still wrong. I'll
look into this further.
> Otherwise it would be nice to get consistency here
We'll get there! :)
Reply to: