Accepted intel-microcode 3.20151106.1~bpo7+1 (amd64 i386 source) into wheezy-backports->backports-policy, wheezy-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 00:53:07 -0200
Source: intel-microcode
Binary: intel-microcode
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 3.20151106.1~bpo7+1
Distribution: wheezy-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Changed-By: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Closes: 777356
Description:
intel-microcode - Processor microcode firmware for Intel CPUs
Changes:
intel-microcode (3.20151106.1~bpo7+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for wheezy-backports (no changes)
* Switch to backports-sloppy-style version numbering
.
intel-microcode (3.20151106.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream microcode data file 20151106
+ New Microcodes:
sig 0x000306f4, pf mask 0x80, 2015-07-17, rev 0x0009, size 14336
sig 0x00040671, pf mask 0x22, 2015-08-03, rev 0x0013, size 11264
+ Updated Microcodes:
sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2015-02-26, rev 0x001c, size 12288
sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2015-08-13, rev 0x001e, size 21504
sig 0x000306d4, pf mask 0xc0, 2015-09-11, rev 0x0022, size 16384
sig 0x000306f2, pf mask 0x6f, 2015-08-10, rev 0x0036, size 30720
sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2015-08-13, rev 0x001d, size 20480
* This massive Haswell + Broadwell (and related Xeons) update fixes
several critical errata, including the high-hitting BDD86/BDM101/
HSM153(?) which triggers an MCE and locks the processor core
(LP: #1509764)
* Might fix critical errata BDD51, BDM53 (TSX-related)
* source: remove superseded upstream data file: 20150121
* Add support for supplementary microcode bundles:
+ README.source: update and mention supplementary microcode
+ Makefile: support supplementary microcode
Add support for supplementary microcode bundles, which (unlike .fw
microcode override files) can be superseded by a higher revision
microcode from the latest regular microcode bundle. Also, fix the
"oldies" target to have its own exclude filter (IUC_OLDIES_EXCLUDE)
* Add support for x32 arch:
+ README.source: mention x32
+ control,rules: enable building on x32 arch (Closes: #777356)
* ucode-blacklist: add Broadwell and Haswell-E signatures
Add a missing signature for Haswell Refresh (Haswell-E) to the "must
be updated only by the early microcode update driver" list. There is
at least one report of one of the Broadwell microcode updates disabling
TSX-NI, so add them as well just in case
Checksums-Sha1:
f30f795fb0095931edf89a3d4a4fbdee1da0e174 1786 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.dsc
ae5ab9eabf4e03f2ef3c48579b24d9c936d104a6 941628 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.tar.xz
7199029c1f3fb38cb573b9d95cb039dddada6571 474798 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_amd64.deb
a6ebc990e0aa7cb3956bf4a0759a2a6e90bc2fbc 618028 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
a2a430604cd9d714762d059dbcd40017e183b4a86349caac3861c705ce4404db 1786 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.dsc
5856a0ba709376573205d9a28f00659e382948af6afc5bfa5a850df2bab0e3b8 941628 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.tar.xz
b5abcd487b561bbd12736e7a38592be1e3fc10392a42920100d905b790b4257f 474798 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_amd64.deb
eb378d7244183b30dcd3857d296a91bd6e12fbcdccc9cd56157bddf838bdca4d 618028 intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_i386.deb
Files:
ce98079a86186e165bae8a4377890853 1786 non-free/admin standard intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.dsc
0bf9aa9fc980e0c7023175003f420f1c 941628 non-free/admin standard intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1.tar.xz
163e389b687709e20f4752afbefb0265 474798 non-free/admin standard intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_amd64.deb
de9964326050d41f9196a7be6cf4873d 618028 non-free/admin standard intel-microcode_3.20151106.1~bpo7+1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=iS7B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: