[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [backport request] proftpd 1.3.3a-3 from squeeze to lenny



Hi Francesco

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:57:58PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I have a request on backporting proftpd from squeeze to stable if this
> > is possible.
> > 
> > I can try to do it myself, but would like to have a feedback from
> > Francesco if possible. 
> > 
> > I have uploaded a first try here: 
> > 
> > 	http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~bonaccos/debian/proftpd/
> > 
> >  Build-Depends: libmysqlclient-dev, libpam-dev, debhelper (>= 7), zlib1g-dev,
> > - libpq-dev, libldap2-dev, libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8l), libwrap0-dev, libcap-dev [linux-any],
> > + libpq-dev, libldap2-dev, libssl-dev, libwrap0-dev, libcap2-dev,
> >   autotools-dev, libncurses5-dev, dpatch, libacl1-dev, libattr1-dev, unixodbc-dev, libsqlite3-dev
> >  Homepage: http://www.proftpd.org/
> > 
> > diff -u proftpd-dfsg-1.3.3a/debian/changelog proftpd-dfsg-1.3.3a/debian/changelog
> > --- proftpd-dfsg-1.3.3a/debian/changelog
> > +++ proftpd-dfsg-1.3.3a/debian/changelog
> > @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> > +proftpd-dfsg (1.3.3a-3~bpo50+1) lenny-backports; urgency=low
> > +
> > +  * Rebuild for lenny-backports.
> > +  * debian/control:
> > +    - Make versioned Build-Depends on libssl-dev unversioned.
> 
> The versioned dependencies has been introduced as follows:
> 
>   * Now requires openssl >= 0.9.8l-1 to have a working 
>     AllowClientRenegotiations.  Renegotiations is disabled in >=
>     0.9.8k-6, but proftpd assumes it works in all versions before 0.9.8l.
> 
> This is due to patching introduced in debian 0.9.8k version of the
> library.
> Specifically, you have also to ensure that the version in use onto the
> target system is the same used for building, else shit could happen
> as in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/proftpd-dfsg/+bug/580512
> 
> IMHO the safest thing is using a backported squeeze openssl version.

Thanks for your feedback again!

Well, my main problem is, I think I do not have the time and skills to
too maintain the backported version of openssl, to be honest, neither
the full skills for proftpd.

On our site we wanted to have the new mod_sftp module, this was my
main reason for the backport request to lenny.

If someone will take it it would be great (but only with your support
as maintainer of proftpd, as you have the best overview on it), but
else squeeze will have it :-)

Bests
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: