Bug#64492: marked as done (When the boot floppies failed to decode the rescue.bin for whatever reason i get a new requester, presenting only the tw ofloppies as install candidates.)
Your message dated 23 May 2000 19:32:32 -0400
with message-id <oavh04yh9r.fsf@arroz.fake>
and subject line Bug#64492: When the boot floppies failed to decode the rescue.bin for whatever reason i get a new requester, presenting only the tw ofloppies as install candidates.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2000 13:57:45 +0000
>From luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr Mon May 22 08:57:45 2000
Return-path: <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
id 12tsiF-00055R-00; Mon, 22 May 2000 08:57:44 -0500
Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.75.49])
by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06513
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 22 May 2000 14:57:23 +0200
Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12tsnC-0003T9-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 22 May 2000 16:02:50 +0200
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 16:02:50 +0200
From: Sven LUTHER <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: When the boot floppies failed to decode the rescue.bin for whatever reason i get a new requester, presenting only the tw ofloppies as install candidates.
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20000522160250.A13334@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
Reply-To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.13
When i try installing the OS and kernel from rescue.bin, and for some reason
or another i fail to propose a good rescue.bin file, i get a new requester,
proposing only the two floppy disks, not partition and mounted (also not
network and other possible sources).
Friendly,
Svne LUTHER
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 64492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2000 23:32:32 +0000
>From adam@onshore.com Tue May 23 18:32:32 2000
Return-path: <adam@onshore.com>
Received: from amsterdam.interport.net [199.184.165.19]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2 (Debian))
id 12uOA4-00029H-00; Tue, 23 May 2000 18:32:32 -0500
Received: from arroz.fake (postfix@216-164-226-253.s507.tnt5.nyw.ny.dialup.rcn.com [216.164.226.253])
by amsterdam.interport.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA20550;
Tue, 23 May 2000 19:32:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 5A1BC93802; Tue, 23 May 2000 19:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@arroz.fake
To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr
Cc: 64492-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#64492: When the boot floppies failed to decode the rescue.bin for whatever reason i get a new requester, presenting only the tw ofloppies as install candidates.
References: <[🔎] 20000522160250.A13334@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 23 May 2000 19:32:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: Sven LUTHER's message of "Mon, 22 May 2000 16:02:50 +0200"
Message-ID: <oavh04yh9r.fsf@arroz.fake>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 64492-done@bugs.debian.org
Sven LUTHER <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> When i try installing the OS and kernel from rescue.bin, and for some reason
> or another i fail to propose a good rescue.bin file, i get a new requester,
> proposing only the two floppy disks, not partition and mounted (also not
> network and other possible sources).
This is a little wierd, but intentional. It's quite common for there
to be bad floppies. It is really not having you redo the step, but
just asking you for another floppy.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: