I am a bit concerned by the name though. I understand it comes from theNetBSD world, actually. It handles 4.2FFS, UFS2 and ISO 9660 (plus SUSP, RRIP, El Torito). Support for ext2fs is possible to be added. But still, renaming an upstream utility ? The package short description should make that clear, maybe. We have: Description: create a file system image from a directory tree Maybe better would be: Description: create a cd9660 or ffs file system image from a directory tree
There are names of other packages that might be confusing in the other way, i.e. name of console-tools, kernel-package, module-assistant, net-tools does not imply they are mainly for Linux. IMHO, the proper short description should be just fine. Petr