On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:44:23 +1100 Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/03/2016 7:35 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: > > Wouldn't it have better to focus on developing Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, > > which could do with the extra attention/work? > > > > Just curious. What was the rationale? > > The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an > officially supported version of Debian; unofficially it has support, > but not officially. > > That is, there is no current "stable" release of Debian/KfreeBSD...., > it is not a production release. > > I wish that KfreeBSD had more love and was a fully supported version > of Debian, but unfortunately it is not. > > It /may/ be better to go straight to FreeBSD direct instead because of > this. Which means escaping the horror of systemd as well as not > having the same "Debian" way of configuration setup. Does Ubuntu even use systemd? I think they use runit or something. Something start*... it escapes me.
Attachment:
pgpHL_gBQuRH0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature