[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gaim 1:0.58-2.4 (sparc source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:00:55 +0100
Source: gaim
Binary: gaim gaim-common gaim-gnome
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1:0.58-2.4
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze <joey@debian.org>
Changed-By: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
Description: 
 gaim       - GPL multi-protocol instant messenger client - Gtk+ version
 gaim-common - GPL multi-protocol instant messenger client - common files
 gaim-gnome - GPL multi-protocol instant messenger client - GNOME applet
Changes: 
 gaim (1:0.58-2.4) stable-security; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload by Security Team
   * Applied patch by Jacques A. Vidrine to fix a Yahoo packet parser
     overflow [src/protocols/yahoo/yahoo.c] and an HTTP proxy connect
     overflow [src/proxy.c], CAN-2004-0006
   * Applied a patch to fix an AIM/Oscar DirectIM integer overflow
     [src/protocols/oscar/ft.c], CAN-2004-0008
Files: 
 6d563a59f4e5079140dd3335893edf42 681 net optional gaim_0.58-2.4.dsc
 b174b13ab2e3d3e3e3000ca55b7f8b83 21828 net optional gaim_0.58-2.4.diff.gz
 ebd452c72e27de0a97a89946b7f4e1f0 409750 net optional gaim_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
 29317f37a8506f5a968b4ceb545a0ff9 428552 net optional gaim-gnome_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
 8b58b5b637c927816b56717229426612 653942 net optional gaim-common_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF8/lW5ql+IAeqTIRAvRYAKCozm2KBB13wYD0RFnHYQ0533Qy2QCdFbjC
hxbN7um3BhpNQKIzuTrqy0g=
=oLbc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
gaim-common_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gaim/gaim-common_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
gaim-gnome_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gaim/gaim-gnome_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
gaim_0.58-2.4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gaim/gaim_0.58-2.4.diff.gz
gaim_0.58-2.4.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gaim/gaim_0.58-2.4.dsc
gaim_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gaim/gaim_0.58-2.4_sparc.deb



Reply to: