Re: testing that signed mails get through (ignore)
Don Armstrong writes ("testing that signed mails get through (ignore)"):
> Trying to make sure that I've fixed the issue with signed mails (by
> keys in the d.o keyring) going through to this list.
I don't know exactly what you've done but we seem to be getting a fair
amount of spam through the list now. Eg, see the message whose
headers I've quoted below which AFAICT ought to have been rejected.
It's annoying having 6 of these a day when the committee list is busy
but the committee list sometimes goes through months without any real
traffic and then a significant spam rate is a real problem.
Ian.
Received: from (chiark.greenend.org.uk) [172.31.80.8]
by davenant.greenend.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1Ibbno-0008FC-00 (Debian); Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:52:12 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.36 #1) with esmtp
(return-path eat07qbf@shentel.net)
id 1Ibbnj-0008RE-00
for ******@chiark.greenend.org.uk; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:52:07 +0100
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (SAUCE v0.8.99.iwj.5)
with esmtp id sauce-21000-1191070-1; 29 Sep 2007 12:52:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [211.178.190.20] (helo=gyaxky)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1IbadA-0004MI-4d; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:37:08 +0000
Message-ID: <270o19151.4656d83435831@shentel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--pakyk4vff0wf851h4vzpckyhs"
Delivered-To: debian-ctte-private@debian.org
X-UIDL: ](d!!V95"!*h_!!Mbd"!
From: "Tasha Laquita" <eat07qbf@shentel.net>
To: <debian-chinese@debian.org>
Subject: Rep1icaRolex, Omega, Cartier, IWC, Swiss QualityWatches qddvv
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:37:06 +0900
Reply to: