Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on init systems
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> Yes, and I think it was wrong that the bug was closed by an upload to
> experimental instead of to unstable when there was nothing
> experimental about it.
Daniel is just being extra careful, using experimental a bit more these
days, to avoid the more discontentment (I don't think there's the need
of explaining the background and history of his situation). It is my
opinion that it isn't a good idea to point finger at him for the extra
care to not break anything.
As for supporting multiple init systems, I'd be pleased if the TC was
expressing about it, and especially that it is the duty of maintainers
to accept patches for them. So I'm all with you on that Steve. I just
regret the course of events, and the fact that Daniel looked
uncooperative, when I'm convinced that he is.
Thomas
Reply to: