Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version
On Nov 06 2016, Ron <ron@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:20:30AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Ron <ron@debian.org> writes:
>> >
>> > I can try to clarify that if there's a question in your mind that
>> > you don't think I touched on there.
>>
>> The question that remains is what you actually intend to do.
>
> Nod. So far here, I've mostly tried to stick to just outlining the
> facts we have to deal with, and the options I think we have and the
> pros and cons of them - because I don't have a preconceived answer
> to that which I'm welded to, and I was more interesting in listening
> to well considered comments that people might have had than turning
> this into a mindless tug of war between two inflexible positions.
It's too bad that you only started doing this after this was escalated
to the CTTE. Had you responded at such length and with so little delay
to the earlier bug reports, the situation would be very different. But
now, your sudden communicativeness just has the opposite effect.
In my opinion, the fact that you had no time for this issue for multiple
years, but are now able to send a large number of long emails about it
to the ctte does not speak in your favor.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
Reply to: