Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?
- To: 978636@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?
- From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:35:28 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] YBf1kHyR099rQ4lz@angband.pl>
- Reply-to: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, 978636@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20210131213427.GB2355636@mosca.iiec.unam.mx>
- References: <5212f5810059c98be7d6742a3dac27ddb81b0900.camel@43-1.org> <5212f5810059c98be7d6742a3dac27ddb81b0900.camel@43-1.org> <87zh0wdfdo.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <20210131213201.GA2355636@mosca.iiec.unam.mx> <5212f5810059c98be7d6742a3dac27ddb81b0900.camel@43-1.org> <20210131213427.GB2355636@mosca.iiec.unam.mx> <5212f5810059c98be7d6742a3dac27ddb81b0900.camel@43-1.org>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 03:34:27PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> ...And to be clear: We at the TC are *not* doing detailed design
> work. But I want to state (and not as part of the vote, but just as
> yet another DD) that the only way I feel makes sense to continue now
> is via Simon's ① option: Symlinking /bin → /usr/bin, /lib → /usr/lib,
> /sbin → /usr/sbin, etc.
>
> That will allow us to take a step later on to mandate packages not
> shipping files in the no-longer-root-level-directories, but that
> should be at least one further release cycle down the lane.
I'd strongly urge the opposite order: FIRST decree that no package may
ship any file to non-canonical path (ie, have dpkg extract anything over
a symlink), and only then flip the switch.
Contrary to talk about a "20 years transition", I estimate there's just
~100 sources that would have to be changed.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .--[ Makefile ]
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ # beware of races
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ all: pillage burn
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ `----
Reply to: