[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#334000: marked as done (different values for blocks should not prevent merging of bug reports)



Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:36:29 -0700
with message-id <20060418233629.GD14053@volo.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Blocks/Blocked-by bugs need to be blocked the same way
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: bugs.debian.org

different values for blocks should not prevent merging of bug reports,
or I fail to see the rationale for this behaviour.

> merge 333100 323133
Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm & m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101)
Bug#333100: hppa: Fails to build kdebluetooth
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `blocks' don't match:
 #323133 has `326224';
 #333100 has `'

PS: blocks/unblocks in not yet documented on
    http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Blocked bugs (and those blocked-by) need to be blocked in the same
way; otherwise merging them will produce an undefined state. Merging
the set of blocks isn't exactly obvious either.

The implementation of forcemerge will enable the second bug to take on
the exact same state as the first bug listed, but that's not yet fully
tested. As that bug already exists in multiple forms (see #14043 et
al.) I'm closing this bug.


Don Armstrong

-- 
The solution to a problem changes the problem.
 -- Peer's Law

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

--- End Message ---

Reply to: