[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#333539: marked as done (debbugs: tag syntax +b fails, and leaves history trail with no change)



Your message dated Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:25:53 -0700
with message-id <20060713072553.GT5382@volo.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Hasn't recured; service.in makes it seem like it can't happen
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debbugs
Severity: minor

See bug #102724: "[WANTED] Linux kernel programming manpages".  Martin
Schulze <joey@debian.org> sent to control@bugs.debian.org the request
"tags 102724 +moreinfo", but the relevent history line in that bug
report says:

  Tags added: Request was from Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.

Maybe the syntax [0] is incorrect .. and should have a space after
"+", but then it probably shouldn't appear in the buglog?  And, could
the BTS possibly be modified (wishlist) to allow that form of the tags
command?  

[0] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I haven't seen a recent version of this bug occuring; the current code
in service.in makes it seem like this won't happen, so I'm closing it.

Please reopen if a recent example of recurrance is found.


Don Armstrong

-- 
I shall require that [a scientific system's] logical form shall be
such that it can be singled out, by means of emperical tests, in a
negative sense: it must be possible for an emperical scientific system
to be refuted by experience.
 -- Sir Karl Popper _Logic of Scientific Discovery_ §6

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

--- End Message ---

Reply to: