Bug#377296: marked as done (Add subscription link to bug log)
Your message dated Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:24:13 -0700
with message-id <20100409232413.GJ21525@teltox.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line fixed in 2.4.2~exp0
has caused the Debian Bug report #377296,
regarding Add subscription link to bug log
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
377296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
>The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
>NNN-subscribe@bugs.debian.org"
This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
--bod
diff -Naur debbugs-2.4.1.orig/cgi/bugreport.cgi debbugs-2.4.1/cgi/bugreport.cgi
--- debbugs-2.4.1.orig/cgi/bugreport.cgi 2003-05-26 02:26:24.000000000 +1000
+++ debbugs-2.4.1/cgi/bugreport.cgi 2006-07-08 10:43:23.900414007 +1000
@@ -417,6 +417,7 @@
print "$descriptivehead\n";
printf "<p>View this report as an <a href=\"%s\">mbox folder</a>.</p>\n", mboxurl($ref);
+print "<p><a href=\"mailto:$ref-subscribe\@$gEmailDomain\";>Subscribe</a> to this bug.</p>
print "<HR>";
print "$log";
print $tail_html;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.2~exp0
This has been fixed in 2.4.2~exp0.
Don Armstrong
--
The computer allows you to make mistakes faster than any other
invention, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila
-- Mitch Ratcliffe
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---
Reply to: