lets end this thread (Re: IPv6 address/port format (summary of valid chars))

To: "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: lets end this thread (Re: IPv6 address/port format (summary of valid chars))
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@mors.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:15:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000111181531.A2417@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] C1A2F779106ED111924E0000F81EEEE5063EB6@biblos.publishing.uwa.edu.au>; from james@publishing.uwa.edu.au on Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 12:44:14PM +0800
References: <[🔎] C1A2F779106ED111924E0000F81EEEE5063EB6@biblos.publishing.uwa.edu.au>

Can we please end this thread? There is already a RFC with the official
notation for this, and it has been mentioned at least twice here as
well.

Wichert

Reply to:

References:
- RE: IPv6 address/port format (summary of valid chars)
  - From: James Bromberger <james@publishing.uwa.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Do we prefer Tk8.0 or 8.2 ? (for python-tk, that is)
Next by Date: Re: RFC: New package "python"
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 address/port format (summary of valid chars)
Next by thread: Bug#54744: general: latex2rtf should be upgraded to latest version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread