Re: ifconfig vs. ip
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > For example, here is what I use to setup a tunnel named "melchior6" to
> > a box connected to the 6bone:
> >
> > ip tunnel add melchior6 ttl 64 mode sit remote 137.194.161.6
> > ip link set melchior6 up
> > ip addr add 3ffe:304:103:a0:2c0:4fff:fe4b:3e28 dev melchior6
> > ip route add 3ffe::/15 dev melchior6
>
> That is significantly easier than the comparable ifconfig/route commands,
> which span nearly a page :>
that still isn't an secure tunnel (as far as i understand) I still like to use utilities that make a secure connection to the other host..
it's easier to run tunnel 172.16.2.0 &
--
get a life, get the second one free...
Reply to: