Re: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Cc: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, quinot@infres.enst.fr, Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>, Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>, "Huneycutt, Doug" <doug.huneycutt@lmco.com>, 56821@bugs.debian.org, pb@enst.fr, quinot@enst.fr, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- From: Thomas Quinot <quinot@hernani.enst.fr>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:48:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20000203104831.A316@hernani.enst.fr>
- Reply-to: quinot@infres.enst.fr
- In-reply-to: <200002030030.SAA00851@cafe.onshore.com>; from Adam Di Carlo on Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 06:30:15PM -0600
- References: <87vh47i28b.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <200002030030.SAA00851@cafe.onshore.com>
Le 2000-02-03, Adam Di Carlo écrivait :
> Please advise. Please do not flame. Less than 3 posts on this topic
> per hour per person please. :)
My first comments on the newly-uploaded boot floppies are:
- disabling the prompt solves the problem as reported;
- the new user information message is appropriate;
- if some users want to have the ability to have an "enabled"
mbr, perhaps this could be proposed as an option in the
installation procedure, eg:
"<information message about the MBR>
--> Do you want to enable MBR's prompting features? (y/n)"
Thomas.
--
Thomas Quinot ** Département Informatique & Réseaux ** quinot@inf.enst.fr
ENST // 46 rue Barrault // 75634 PARIS CEDEX 13
Reply to: