Re: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- To: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Cc: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org>, Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>, "Huneycutt, Doug" <doug.huneycutt@lmco.com>, 56821@bugs.debian.org, pb@enst.fr, quinot@enst.fr, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [POSSIBLE GRAVE SECURITY HOLD]
- From: Thomas Quinot <quinot@email.enst.fr>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:36:24 +0100
- Message-id: <20000203003624.A2812@lantier.enst.fr>
- Reply-to: quinot@inf.enst.fr
- In-reply-to: <20000202151522.J7238@visi.net>; from bcollins@debian.org on Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 03:15:22PM -0500
- References: <2000-02-02-11-38-12+trackit+sam@debian.org> <87vh47k3v1.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <20000202175255.E50448@enst.fr> <873drby1na.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <20000202181855.H50448@enst.fr> <87n1pjy0qs.fsf@erwin.complete.org> <20000202184944.K50448@enst.fr> <20000202151522.J7238@visi.net>
Le 2000-02-02, Ben Collins écrivait :
> Quite simply, there is no such thing as a default security for physical
> access. You said yourself that you have to change LILO in order to achieve
> this anyway, why didn't you just edit lilo to install on the MBR?
>
> boot=/dev/hda
> root=/dev/hda1
>
> It's quite simple.
Granted, this is simple. What is your point in insisting that this should
not be documented?
--
Thomas Quinot ** Département Informatique & Réseaux ** quinot@inf.enst.fr
ENST // 46 rue Barrault // 75634 PARIS CEDEX 13
Reply to: