Re: new LIBMPEG package; what should happen with the old one?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> hi,
>
> i intent to package the libmpeg2 1.1.0 library from
> http://heroine.linuxbox.com/ and have a problem with the name of the
> package :( there is allready a libmpeg1 package comming from other
> developer team so it whould bracke the policy calling my package libmpeg2
> but what should i do instead? call it libmpeg21?
Could you call it libmpegtwo1?
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: